直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Enforcing Bridgestone’s top-selling brand

Bridgestone Firestone

Federal Corp.

Finnegan successfully overturned a ruling against two of Bridgestone’s top-selling tire brands POTENZA and TURANZA. Bridgestone appealed a TTAB decision dismissing its opposition against Federal Corporation’s application to register the mark MILANZA for tires. In that decision, the TTAB refused to find Bridgestone’s POTENZA and TURANZA marks commercially strong because they frequently appear with the BRIDGESTONE house mark. On appeal, the Federal Circuit issued a unanimous precedential decision reversing the TTAB and finding that MILANZA is likely to be confused with POTENZA and TURANZA based on, among other things, the independent strength achieved by the POTENZA and TURANZA marks through massive sales and advertising and the similarities between POTENZA, TURANZA, and MILANZA. The Federal Circuit also held that the simultaneous use of BRIDGESTONE with POTENZA and TURANZA does not denigrate the fame and strength of those product marks.

Bridgestone Firestone v. Federal Corp., 10-1376, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Newman, Plager

Bridgestone Firestone v. Federal Corp., Opp. 91168556, TTAB, Judge Dunn

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email
Danny M. Awdeh
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4353
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials

Manufacturing

Consumer Products

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Experiences

Bridgestone Brands, LLC v. Balkrishna Indus., Ltd.

Bridgestone Brands, LLC

Bridgestone Firestone v. FleetPride

Bridgestone Firestone

Bridgestone Brands, LLC et al. v. Dastgah

Bridgestone Brands, LLC

Bridgestone Firestone v. ContiTech

Bridgestone Firestone

Henkel IP & Holding GmbH v. Orora North America Corporation

Henkel IP & Holding GmbH

Omega Patents LLC v. BMW of North America LLC

BMW of North America LLC

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan clients Hyundai and Kia in a tire pressure monitoring system patent case

Hyundai Motor Co.; Kia Motors Corp.

Federal Circuit reinstates jury’s infringement verdict for Finnegan client Uniloc USA

Uniloc USA

Markem-Imaje Corp. v. Zipher, Ltd.

Zipher, Ltd.; Videojet Technologies

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP